🧮 Firms of 30 to 80 people
Your firm's value is in the interpretation. Your cost is the hours spent keying in what the tax authority already publishes as XML.
Book your 30-minute callNo cost, no slide deck. You leave with a concrete answer.
Three of the five packs, in the words you use every day.
Download from the portal, validation against the tax authority, classification using the rules your firm already applies, and posting to the system. Human review is left for what actually requires judgement — which is what you were hired for.
Automatic reminders per client and per stage, both for your fees and for the documents still missing. It escalates only when the silence is becoming a filing-deadline risk.
Your internal criteria, circulars and past resolutions answering in seconds, with the source cited. The new junior stops interrupting the partner to ask what is already written down.
The hours are ranges observed in processes of this type, not promises. The diagnostic measures them against your real numbers.
If yours isn't on the list, it usually connects anyway: through an API, through the database, or through the file you already export.
Because a filing error is not fixed with "sorry, the system did it". So nothing is automated without an audit trail of every decision and without your team being able to review before anything is posted. Automation starts where the judgement is already standardised, not where it still has to be exercised.
No. It classifies what your own rules already classify and flags whatever does not fit for a person to resolve. The judgement stays yours — and it stays the thing you bill for.
It is settled in the diagnostic. For firms it usually lands on an arrangement where sensitive data never leaves your infrastructure.
It works better. Repetitive volume is exactly where automated data entry pays, and exactly where your junior payroll is going today.
Five days, $2,900 USD. If I don't find at least 40 automatable hours a month, you get your money back.
Book your 30-minute call